Big possible news today. This one’s possibly big, so big it’s a two-parter.
Part 1: There is a group in existence called the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers. This is a non-for profit group that isn’t directly controlled by the government. They are responsible for all things involving assignment of names and numbers online.
Part 2: The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers is considering allowing people to have websites with any domain name they want. The days of the “.com” and “.org” oppression are over!
I have said for a long time that porn sites should all be .sex. I’m all for pornography, as you may know by now, but I have a certain amount of concern about children accidentally stumbling onto porn sites. When I was a kid, “gamefaqs.com” was a site that featured walkthroughs and faqs for popular video games. “Gamefaq.com” was an amazingly hardcore porn site that featured beastiality. As curious as I was as a child, I don’t think I would have willingly visited an animal porn site, and if it had been gamefaq.sex, I never would have seen a woman make love to a jaguar at age ten.
But, of course, the reason gamefaq.com existed was to trick kids into giving them traffic. Reputable porn producers wouldn’t do something like this; it’s a desperate move. It would be like if I made the address of my blog “bigtitties.semen,” which I’m not ruling out for the future.
But really, how much do you think they’re going to be able to sell “clownpenis.fart” for? I bet they’ll get millions.
I’d like to invite you all to send in your own clever domain names, and if there’s one that strikes my fancy, it may just become my new blog web address.
It’s actually clownpenis.queef.
of the top of me head:
taboo.two
friesenpoint.beard
everydayibejackin.off
combinationburrito.chickenstrips
feces.pringlescan
A woman make love to a jaguar!!!!! Haha. Ridiculous.
I like all of Crain’s web addresses, but I feel that it would be wrong of me to take “combinationburrito.chickenstrips.” I feel it’s only right to leave that in case Ben one day wants to write a blog about going to multiple fast food restaurants for one meal. Seriously Ben? Taco Bell and Hardees?
It was Taco Bell and KFC, 2 snackers and 2 bean burritos for under $5, now that’s value. Luckily in Chicago there are a couple combo tbell/kfc’s so it’s not nearly as sad as going to two drive thrus. I would usually eat one of the snackers while waiting for my burritos in the drive thru.
Ben, I’m not sure that helps your case. I know it’s a good deal, but at what great cost to your soul and reputation.
“I would usually eat one of the snackers while waiting for my burritos in the drive thru.”
that’s a pretty depressing image. Ben, you’re why Yum! Brands gets to sponsor the Kentucky Derby.
Those snackers were dressed with mayonnaise, a lettuce leaf, and a single tear.